Students' Relational Thinking in Solving Word Problem Based Cognitive Style

Akhmad Syaiful Bahri, Agung Lukito, Masriyah Masriyah

Abstract


This study is motivated by students' low relational thinking ability. Relational thinking is one of the interesting problems in mathematics education. In this study will be examined the ability of relational thinking field-dependent and independent students in solving the arithmetic word problem. The method used in this study is qualitative descriptive. This research was conducted on 7th-grade of junior school students of Surabaya. The subjects of this study were 1 student who had a field-independent cognitive style and 1 student who had a field-dependent cognitive style. The data of the students' relational thinking process is obtained through the results of solving arithmetic word problem and interviews. Subject selection is done using instrument group embedded figures test. The results of the research showed that students with cognitive field-dependent experiences had difficulties in thinking and have not been able to establish the relationship between information elements and previous knowledge to solve problems. Whereas students with independent field cognitive styles were capable of relational thinking, namely by building interrelationships between elements of information and prior knowledge and knowledge of the properties of structure to solve problems.

Keywords


Relational Thinking; Cognitive Style Field Dependent; Cognitive Style Field Independent; Word Problem;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afandi, A. (2018). Difference of learning mathematics between open question model and conventional model. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 13-18.

Amalia, R., Saiman, S., Sofiyan, S., & Mursalin, M. (2018, September). Designing computer-based fraction worksheets for junior high school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012110). IOP Publishing.

Baiduri. (2014). A relational thinking process of elementary school students with high capability. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology. 4(2), 24-34.

Fonna, M., & Mursalin, M. (2019). Using of Wingeom Software in Geometry Learning to Improving the of Mathematical Representation Ability. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(2).

Hagerty, M., Mayer R.E, & Monk C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: a comparison of successful problem solvers. Journal of Education Psychology. 87(1), 18-32.

Hejny, M., Jirotkova, D. & Kratochvilova, D. (2006). ”Early Conceptual thinking”. In Novotna, J, Moraova, H., Kratka, M. & Sthelikova, N. (Eds), Proceedings 30th Conferences of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 289-296. Prague: PME.

Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive Style in the Context of Modern Psychology: Toward and Integrated Framework of Cognitive Style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464-481.

Kurniawan, D., & Wahyuningsih, T. (2018). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Statistics Courses. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(2).

Liu. Y. & Ginther, D. (1999). Cognitive Style and Distance Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2(3). 1-17.

Molina, M., & Ambrose, R. (2008). “From an operation to a relational conception of the equal sign: Thirds grades’ developing algebraic thinking”. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 30 (1), 61-80.

Molina, Marta; Castro, Encarnación; Castro, Enrique (2008). Third graders' strategies and use of relational thinking when solving number sentences. En Figueras, O.; Cortina, J. L.; Alatorre, S.; Rojano, T.; Sepúlveda, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME32 and PME-NA XXX (pp. 3-399). Morelia: Departamento de Didáctica de la Matemática, CINVESTAV.

Napaphun, V. (2012). Relational thinking: Learning arithmetic in order to promote algebraic thinking. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 35 (2), 84-101.

Robertson, I. T. (2007). Human Information-Processing Strategies and Style. Behavior and Information Technology. 4(1), 19-29. Abstract was retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/1 0.1 080/01449298508901784.

Shoseki, Tokyo. (2006) “Mathematics for Elementary School” Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki Publishing.

Simanjuntak, S. D., & Imelda, I. (2019). Student’s Difficulty Analysis Through Realistic Mathematics Education Using Batak Toba Cultures. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(3).

Winarso, W. (2018). Authentic Assessment for Academic Performance; Study on the Attitudes, Skills, and Knowledge of Grade 8 Mathematics Students. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1)

Woolfolk, A & Margetts, K. (2010). Educational Psychology. Australia: Pearson Education.

Wooldridge, B. & Bartolf, M. (2006). The Field Dependence/Field Independence Learning Style; Implication For Adult Student Diversity, Outcomes Assessment And Accountability. Editor: R.R. Sims and SJ. Sims, pp. 237-257. Nova Science Publisher, Inc. New York.

Wulandari, Y. O., & Damayanti, N. W. (2019). Scaffolding Based on Telolet Game in Teaching Integers. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(2).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i1.37

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 11 times
PDF - 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Akhmad Syaiful Bahri, Agung Lukito, Masriyah Masriyah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER)

E-ISSN 2621-8488  | DOI Prefix 10.33122/ijtmer

Publisher : IIES Independent
Website   : http://www.ijtmer.com
E-mail      : ijtmer@gmail.com or cc to mursalin@unimal.ac.id

 

Creative Commons License  IJTMER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.