Design of ARCSI Learning Model with Scientific Approach for Teaching Mathematics in School

Usmadi Usmadi, Ergusni Ergusni

Abstract


The study was aimed to obtain information regarding the design instructional of ARCSI learning model with the scientific approach for teaching mathematics in school. This learning model developed based on the learning conditions at Junior High School (SMP/MTs) in Bukittinggi City and Agam Districts of West Sumatera requiring a model of learning based on Islamic values, strategy in the motivation of ARCSI, and a scientific approach mandated in the curriculum of 2013. This learning model is designed for forming the character of learners in an Islamic way the learning process of mathematics that pleasant, and train students to think critically and comprehensively through a scientific approach. Synonymous ARCSI Learning Model with scientific approach, namely: (1) Attract the attention of learners by inviting praying/pleading to Allah Ta’ala, (2) Convey the purpose/benefit of learning and its application in daily activity, (3) The deliberations of the group to establish ukhuwah Islamiyah within the group, (4) a class discussion to establish ukhuwah Islamiyah classically, (5) Giving satisfaction to students with learning will make only because of Allah Ta’ala and the tradition of Prophet Muhammad SAW (6) Evaluate processes and the results of solving problems, and (7) Closing the learning by reading Hamdallah and greetings.

Keywords


ARCSI Learning Model; Scientific Approach; Mathematics Learning;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, R., Saiman, S., Sofiyan, S., & Mursalin, M. (2018, September). Designing computer-based fraction worksheets for junior high school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012110). IOP Publishing.

Afandi, A. (2018). Difference of learning mathematics between open question model and conventional model. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 13-18.

Ashori, Budi dan Sembodo,Ilham M. (2012). Modul Kuttab. Jakarta. Al-Fatih Pilar Peradaban.

Ausubel, D.P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Education Psychology, 51, 267-272.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy:The Exercise of Control.New York: W.H.Freeman.

Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating Students to Learn, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bushro A. & Halimah B. Z. (2005). Pembinaan Perisian Adaptif Multimedia dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Pelajar Berasaskan Teori Kecerdasan Pelbagai. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi Selangor.

Duffy, T.M. & Jonasse, D.H. (1991). Constructivisme: New implications for Instructional Technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-12.

Elfindri, dkk. (2010). Soft Skills untukPendidik. Praninta Offset. Baduose Media.

Fonna, M., & Mursalin, M. (2018a). Role of Self-Efficacy Toward Students’ Achievement in Mathematical Multiple Representation Ability (MMRA). Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 6(1), 31-40.

Fonna, M., & Mursalin, M. (2018b). Pengembangan Modul Geometri Analitik Bidang Berbantuan Wingeom Software untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Malikussaleh. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 391-402.

Gagne, Robert M. dan Driscoll, Marcy P. (1988). Essentials of learning for instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Hakim, L. (2017). Analisis Perbedaan Antara Kurikulum KTSP dan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 17(2), 280. doi:10.22373/jid.v17i2.1644

Herdiana, Y., Wahyudin, & Sispiyati, R. (2017). Effectiveness of Discovery Learning Model on Mathematical Problem Solving. AIP Conference Proceedings 1868, 050028(2017), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995155

Hyland, P. (2006). A Case Study of Online Assessment for Basic Mathematics to Motivate Learners and Enhance Learning. Http://Www.Pi.Ac.Ae/ Metsmac /Proceedings /2006/ Hyland-P-Metsmac 2006. pdf

In’am, A., & Hajar, S. (2017). Learning Geometry through Discovery Learning Using a Scientific Approach. International Journal of Instruction,10(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1014a

Joyce,B and Weil, M., dan Calhoun, Emily. (2011). Model of Teaching(Model-Model Pengajaran- Edisi ke 8. Ahmad Fawaid dan Ateila Mirza: Terjemahan).

Kemendikbud. (2014). Bahan Penataran: Sosialisasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta.

Keller, J. M. & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Education Media, 29 (3), 175-189. Tersedia pada http//www.arcs model.com. Di download tanggal 14 April 2014.

Keller, J. M., (1987a). Development and Use of The ARCS Model of Motivational Design. Journal of Instructional Development 10(3), hal. 2-10.

Keller, J. M., (1987b) Strategies for Stimulating The Motivation to Learn. Performance and Instruction Journal 26(8), hal. 1-7.

Keller, J. M., (1987c). The Systematic Process of Motivational Design. Performance and Instruction Journal 25(7), hal. 1-8.

Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development 2(4), 26-34.

Means, T. B., Jonassen, D. H., & Dwyer, F. M., (1997). Enhancing Relevance. Embedded ARCS Strategies Vs. Purpose. Educational Technology, Research & Development 45, hal. 5-17.

Mursalin, M., Nuraini, N. L. S., Purnomo, H., Damayanti, N. W., Kristanti, D., Rohim, A., ... & Fonna, M. (2018, September). The development of algebra teaching materials to foster students’ creative thinking skills in higher education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1088, No. 1, p. 012101). IOP Publishing

Nurhalim, M. (2015). Optimalisasi Kurikulum Aktual dan Kurikulum Tersembunyi dalam Kurikulum 2013. Insania: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 19(1), 115–132.

doi:10.24090/insania.v19i1.466

Plomp, T.,(2013). Educational Design Research: An Introduction, in An Introduction to Educational Research. Enschede, Netherlands: National Institute for Curriculum Development.

Santrock, John W. (2010) Educational Psychologi, Ed. 2.dialih bahasakan oleh Tri Wibowo B.S., Psikologi Pendidikan (Jakarta: Kencana 2010).

Shellnut, B., Knowlton, A., & Savage, T. (1999). Applying The ARCS Model to The Design and Development of Computer-Based Modules for Manufacturing Engineering Courses. Educational Technology, Research and Development 47, hal. 100-110.

Small, R. (2000). Motivation in Instructional Design. Teacher Librarian 27(5), 29-31.

Thahir, M., Roza, Y., & Murni, A. (2018). Validity of learning website of kapita selekta mathematics course at UIN Suska Riau Students. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 1(1), 19-25.

Vgotsky, L.(1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard Press.

Visser, J. & Keller, J. M., (1990). The Clinical Use of Motivational Message: An Inquiry Into The Validity of The ARCS Model of Motivational Design. Instruct. Science, 19, 2011, hal. 467-599.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i1.28

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Usmadi Usmadi, Ergusni Ergusni



International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research (IJTMER)

E-ISSN 2621-8488  | DOI Prefix 10.33122/ijtmer

Publisher : IIES Independent
Website   : http://www.ijtmer.com
E-mail      : ijtmer@gmail.com or cc to mursalin@unimal.ac.id

 

Creative Commons License  IJTMER is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.